Amicus Brief in Hardy v. United States Trails Act Taking Case
Nov 14, 2019 | Property Rights
On November 6, 2019, True North Law filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on behalf of property rights organizations and a prominent legal scholar in support of Georgia landowners whose land was taken by the federal government for a public recreational rail-trail. The Cato Institute, Southeastern Legal...
Sarasota FL – Legacy Trail Easement
Nov 13, 2019 | Constitutional Law, Property Rights
This lawsuit is a Fifth Amendment taking case in which Sarasota County Florida landowners ask this Court to order the federal government to pay them for property the federal government took from them. The government took these owners’ land for the northern extension of the Legacy Trail between Sarasota and Venice. The Legacy Trail is a public...
Brandt v. United States amicus brief
Nov 10, 2019 | Property Rights
(U.S. Supreme Court), 572 U.S. 93 (2014) We served as lead counsel for amici curiae Cato Institute, American Farm Bureau Federation, American Land Title Association, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, Public Lands Council, and Property Law Professors James Ely, Jr., Richard Epstein, Donald Kochan, and Dale Whitman in a case filed by the U.S....
Brott v. United States
Nov 9, 2019 | Property Rights
(U.S. Supreme Court) We represented a group of Michigan property owners in this Trails Act taking case, concurrently filed in both the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, challenging the Tucker Act’s prohibition on filing taking cases against the United States over $10,000 in an Article...
St. Bernard Parish Gov v. United States
Nov 8, 2019 | Constitutional Law, Property Rights
Amicus Brief (U.S. Supreme Court) We represented amici curiae NFIB Small Business Legal Center, Reason Foundation, Southeastern Legal Foundation, National Association of Reversionary Property Owners, Property Rights Foundation of America, and Professor James W. Ely, Jr., in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Supreme...
West Chelsea Buildings, LLC v. United States
Nov 4, 2019 | Property Rights
(U.S. Supreme Court) We represented property owners in New York City in takings litigation regarding the High Line, a popular elevated recreational park on the West Side of Manhattan. Those landowners sought to appeal their claims for compensation under the Fifth Amendment for the taking of their property to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Bay Point Properties, Inc. v. Mississippi Transportation Comm’n
Nov 3, 2019 | Property Rights
Amicus Brief (U.S. Supreme Court)We represented amici curiae Cato Institute, NFIB Small Business Legal Center, Southeastern Legal Foundation, National Association of Reversionary Property Owners, Property Rights Foundation of America, and Law Professors James W. Ely, Jr., Shelley Ross Saxer, and Ilya Somin. This case challenged a Mississippi...
Shoemaker v. Kander
Nov 2, 2019 | Constitutional Law, Property Rights
(Missouri Supreme Court), 464 S.W.3d 171 (Mo. 2015). Thor successfully represented Missouri Farmers Care, a coalition of agricultural groups, in defense of Missouri Constitutional Amendment 1, the “Right to Farm Amendment” in a statewide recount and state supreme court election contest.
Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
Oct 19, 2019 | Property Rights
Thor represented Arizona citizens and voters in a U.S. Supreme Court challenge of the 2012 redistricting plan for Arizona state legislative districts, where the redistricting commission produced a redistricting map with a nearly 9% population deviation, diluting the votes of thousands of Arizona voters. Thor argued this case before the Supreme...
Recent Posts
- Sarasota Landowners Represented by True North Law File Final Comprehensive Summary Judgment Brief
- True North Law Files U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief on behalf of Former Attorney General John Ashcroft in Trump Immunity Case
- St. Louis Post-Dispatch Publishes Editorial by Thor Hearne “U.S. Taxpayers Shouldn’t Subsidize the Chinese Communist Party”